The Sedition Act of For the first few years of Constitutional government, under the leadership of George Washington, there was a unity, commonly called Federalism that even James Madison the future architect of the Republican Party acknowledged in describing the Republican form of government-- " And according to the degree of pleasure and pride we feel in being republicans, ought to be our zeal in cherishing the spirit and supporting the character of Federalists.
Thirty years after a war that wounded its heart, 20 years after a scandal that scarred its conscience, 10 years after fiscal policies that ridiculed its sense of responsibility and fairness, the country has nearly exhausted the qualities by which democracy survives and flourished.
As Americans we have come to act more oppressed by freedom than invigorated by it, more concerned with freedom from rather than freedom to.
We divide between the vast majority of us who -- out of futility, confusion or indifference -- are so disengaged from democracy we never vote at all, and those of us who vote not to thoughtfully resolve complicated issues but Rush limbaugh response essay express our rage.
History is clear that democracy cannot long navigate a sea of national rage. Untempered by rationale and open-mindedness, fury eventually consumes democracy rather than nourishes it, because it overwhelms our tolerance, our willingness to be reasonably informed, our determination to hold ourselves accountable for what we decide.
Most important, it overwhelms our basic faith in democracy itself and our belief in the individual freedoms that are inviolate to the power of the majority, identified by the Declaration of Independence as endowed by God and codified in the first 10 amendments to the Constitution.
We display less patience, in other words, with other Americans. A deep freeze has settled in the American soul. The nation gets meaner and more petty until rage is the only national passion left -- and then it is anger not at those on top, which is the anger America was born of, but at those on the bottom.
Increasingly, we view individual freedom not as the fundamental building block of collective freedom but as an affront to collective sensibility or security. We are encouraged by talk-show commentators to regard the most basic precepts of democracy as sentimental luxuries at best or, at worst, as legalistic refuge for vicious criminals, social parasites and moral scum.
We find indignant solace in the single greatest myth of the contemporary political landscape, which holds that the problem with the country is the government and the politicians and the process as a Rush limbaugh response essay.
This myth, that the process has grown helplessly out of touch with what we really want and feel and need, is the opposite of the truth. The truth is that we are the problem with America.
Confronted with change that is truly profound or revolutionary, which is to say unavoidably painful and disorienting, we scurry back to the status quo that so infuriated us to begin with, and that not so long ago we claimed was unacceptable.
When they speak of unpleasant realities and tell us things must necessarily get harder before they get easier -- Bob Dole on the subject of the deficit and Bruce Babbitt on taxes during the presidential campaign ofPaul Tsongas on the economy inWarren Rudman and Bob Kerrey on entitlements, William J.
Bennett and Jack Kemp on illegal immigration -- we dismiss them at the polls or denounce them from the streets. From political season to political season we demand our problems be solved and then make ruthlessly clear we expect someone else to pay the price.
We say we want government to be smaller, but we never name government programs directly affecting us that we would be willing to forgo.
People in the cities cry for cutting farm subsidies, people in the suburbs call for cutting inner-city programs. To suggest we are hypocrites sounds elitist.
It subverts the populism on which both the Right and Left capitalize, and offends the professed egalitarianism of a news media already cowed by accusations of liberal bias. Our common sense admits that national economic survival is not served by cutting taxes and is not possible without addressing the epic components that make up most of the national budget, which one segment or another of the public has declared sacrosanct: That is because we have secretly come to fear and resent that the American dream itself may be a delusion.
This is the source of our rage, and of the rage that would devour democracy. It is a rage at ourselves, which we can barely stand to live with but which is the only thing that seems to pump blood through the national heart anymore.
It is a rage at contradictions that confound and beset us.
Though America has won the Cold War, we grow spiritually lethargic: International triumph appears not to have so much consolidated our power as dissipated it, and perhaps revealed its uselessness.
Though the economy improves, we grow financially insecure: Though the crime rate has dropped, we grow physically vulnerable: It is the very nature of modern crime, rather than its numbers, which bends our darkest imagination -- not just because crime has become more random and bizarre, but because it is now being committed by children for reasons that they cannot even name, and which confirm that an year-old may be soul-dead and beyond redemption.
Though our culture mirrors our vicarious desires, we grow sensually alienated from ourselves: All of these contradictions conspire to make democracy senseless, and all grow out of the biggest delusion of all, the delusion that most enrages us.
This is the delusion of American innocence. A virtual cottage industry of social and cultural psychoanalysis has been built on this delusion, as one historical phenomenon after another -- from the assassination of John F. Simpson hurtling down the L.
One of the most successful motion pictures of was about nothing less, its hero not only all the more noble but apparently all the more American for how dimwitted he is.
We have not grown up enough to accept that America has never been innocent at all; it is not possible to call innocent a country where the original residents were systematically wiped out and the new tenants built a society in large part on the labor of people who were shipped over in chains from another continent in the hulls of boats.
Fangrrls is about kicking down doors, breaking boundaries and celebrating female fans with fun, witty and entertaining content. The best opinions, comments and analysis from The Telegraph. Rush Limbaugh dedicated some time on his massively popular radio show this week to address the Left's attempt to paint Donald Trump's victory as a product of widespread racism among whites.
But that such an idealist and romantic country was created out of such profound transgressions is a more complicated paradox than we can entertain. In this growing contradiction between our false innocence and our true idealism, the argument over the meaning of America is increasingly left to those who populate the extremes of anarchy and repression: The present occupant of the White House, for example.
Bill Clinton -- or perhaps more precisely, the phenomenon of Clinton -- is his own contradiction.There are some truths that I strive to preach, for lack of a better word, in today's information-culture wars propagated in our corrupt mainstream media.
The Case for Reparations. Two hundred fifty years of slavery. Ninety years of Jim Crow. Sixty years of separate but equal. Thirty-five years of racist housing policy. Inside JESUS CHRIST SUPERSTAR background and analysis by Scott Miller We made him a type of Everyman.
Judas did not think of himself as a traitor. Not long ago, after I had written an article in which I discussed white denial–the tendency for most white folks to reject the notion that racism is still a significant obstacle for people of color in the U.S.–.
Nov 21, · There was once a time when Republican lawmakers counted a good number of liberals among them, and Democrats enjoyed the membership of many conservatives. The party of Buckley and Reagan is now bereft and dominated by the politics of Limbaugh. A conservative's lament.