A discussion on the manifestations of patriarchy and hegemonic masculinity as violence

How do you prove someone is suicidal, before they neck the overdose?

A discussion on the manifestations of patriarchy and hegemonic masculinity as violence

These posts kicked up more of a furor than I anticipated, with a bunch of cross-postings and responses on other blogs. I go by Clarisse. Identifying as feminist and pro-BDSM can be really fraught territory — many avowed feminists regard BDSM with suspicion and some, on the more extreme end, with outright hatred.

Nine Deuce, a popular radical feminist blogger, has been known to assert that sadists are morally obligated to either repress their sadistic desires or kill themselves. I swear, I have the biggest crush on Audacia Ray. I want to be her when I grow up. In Chicago, I lectured on BDSM and sexual communication, and I created and curated a fabulous sex-positive film series and discussion group that it broke my heart to leave.

The film series was so successful that a group of loyalists gathered, formed a committee, and have continued it without me! My degree is in Philosophy, Religious Studies and Studio Art, not anything gender-related — and when I was in college I remember that I often viewed hard-line feminist assertions with suspicion.

The problem is, of course, exacerbated by the fact that definitions of feminism have become so varied and so many different issues have been attached to feminism by different people.

These are some of the reasons I tried to spend my entire Entitled Cis Het Men post series asking questions, rather than making assertions. One commenter who went by Sailorman over at Alas said, on the third post: I read this thread with interest, but it is of course basically a very extended and well written TPHMT argument?

I really am just interested in exploring various and often very discrete masculinity-related questions. No, really, I am. In the third one, I failed to make a point that really needed to be made, which is: So what comes clear from that correction is that, yeah — if we want to boil this down to the Oppression Olympics, I do think women have it worse than men and that America is still more centered around and gives more aggregate power to men.

But the whole point of those posts was to evade the Oppression Olympics! He was referring to the third post in particular, I think, in which I talk about how many feminist spaces are arguably hostile to men, and it might be in the interest of feminists to make them less hostile.

In that segment, my language became especially strong: I did things like refer to men as The Oppressive Class, for instance. Oh, my broken feminist heart.

I agree with Toy Soldier that this may not have been the best tactic.

A discussion on the manifestations of patriarchy and hegemonic masculinity as violence

In general, I try to support debating as charitably and with as reasonable a tone as possiblewhich is something I did not succeed at in Part 3. Another comment Toy Soldier posted: It seems more that, like many feminists, she wants to define the problem, define the terms, define the rules of discussion and define the solution.

This is partly a reasonable point. I asked a bunch of interrelated but differently-focused questions. And yet there were plenty of men who answered the posts, emailed me, etc. I confess that, as a man whom I imagine most people would probably define as normative — at least according to the criteria Clarisse has been using in her series — I have trouble with the premise of this question.Screening the Industrial City Saint Etienne, France, November Deadline for proposals: 31 January Cinema, an art of the masses yet also a very bourgeois art form, was born in the wake of industrialisation in the late nineteenth century.

The contention of this discussion is that hegemonic masculinity as a form of power which profoundly determines social and political relations can be approached as a fundamental underlying cause of. Sociology of gender is a prominent subfield of urbanagricultureinitiative.com interaction directly correlated with sociology regarding social structure.

One of the most important social structures is urbanagricultureinitiative.com is determined based on position that an individual possesses which effects how he/she will be treated by society.

is and in to a was not you i of it the be he his but for are this that by on at they with which she or from had we will have an what been one if would who has her.

A discussion on the manifestations of patriarchy and hegemonic masculinity as violence

Sociology of gender is a prominent subfield of urbanagricultureinitiative.com interaction directly correlated with sociology regarding social structure. One of the most important social structures is urbanagricultureinitiative.com is determined based on position that an individual possesses .

The concept of hegemonic masculinity attempts to capture the mix of practice, ideal and attitude among men which reflects the situation of gender inequality that is .

The 7 Most Common Feminist Insults – Return Of Kings